Complaint July 27, 2016 (2024)

Complaint July 27, 2016 (1)

Complaint July 27, 2016 (2)

  • Complaint July 27, 2016 (3)
  • Complaint July 27, 2016 (4)
  • Complaint July 27, 2016 (5)
  • Complaint July 27, 2016 (6)
  • Complaint July 27, 2016 (7)
  • Complaint July 27, 2016 (8)
  • Complaint July 27, 2016 (9)
  • Complaint July 27, 2016 (10)
 

Preview

I ‘J 3/‘ MISHAELA J. GRAVES, State Bar N0.: 259765 KRISTY GABRIELOVA, State Bar N0.: 274827 FgLEfi {SAN MATEO COUNTY PATRICK T. SULLIVAN, State Bar N0.: 263613 DEANNA FRASER, State Bar N0.: 270362 W CHAD K. CASEY, State Bar N0.: 297552 10601-G TIERRASANTA BLVD, #4540 SAN DIEGO, CA 92124 U1 Telephone: (866) 300-8750 Facsimile: (877) 41 I~6864 Attorneys for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA \OOO\]O\ COUNTY OF SAN MATEO HALL OF JUSTICE & RECORDS 10 MIDLAND FUNDING LLC Case No. 1 6 C L J 0 0 6 6 4 ll Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR: ‘ 12 vs. (1) Account Stated ___ __ _ 13' K15 j BLT-001564 RAYMOND EUSANTOS aka RAYMOND C. PRAYER AMT: $2,280.65 l CMP Complaint Filed‘ I 14 EUSANTOS; LIMITED and DOES l through 10, inclusive i 15 11111111111111111111111 Defendant. \ 16 17 1. Plaintiff, MIDLAND FUNDING LLC ("Plaintiff"), is a Limited Liability Company 18 qualified to do business in California. 19 2. This court is the proper court because Plaintiff is informed and believes that Defendant 20 RAYMOND EUSANTOS aka RAYMOND C. EUSANTOS ("Defendant"), is a resident of SAN 21 MATEO County, State of California. 3. Plaintiff is unaware of the true names and capacities of Defendants sued by the fictitious 22 names DOES 1 through 10. Plaintiff will ask leave of court to amend this complaint as and when the true 23 names and capacities of Defendants named herein as DOES 1 through 10 have been ascertained. 24 4. At all times herein mentioned, Defendants, and each of them, were the principals, agents, 25 employers, employees, masters, or servants of each of their co-defendants and ratified, adopted or 26 approved the acts or omissions alleged herein, and each defendant, in doing the things alleged, were 27 acting in the course and scope of said authority of such agents, servants, and employees. 28 5. Pursuant to California Civil Code §1788.58(a)(1), Plaintiff is a debt buyer as defined by California Civil Code §-1788.50(a). -1. COMPLAINT CA_0132G File N0.: 333277 6. Pursuant to California Civil Code §l788.58(a)(2), is seeking to recover the amount of A8 $2,280.65. This is the amount due on credit card account number XXXXXXXXXXXX-SSSl XVJ ("Account")‘ which was originally issued by CITIBANK, N.A.. The amount due is the result of transactions thatoccurred on the Account. 7. Pursuant to California Civil Code §1788.58(a)(3), Plaintiff is the sole owner‘ of the debt. \OOOflQM-QLANfl Attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the Bill of Sale from CITIBANK, N.A. to Plaintiff. The account was purchased by the Plaintiff on March 26, 2014. 8. Pursuant to California Civil Code §1788.58(a)(4), the Account balance at the time of charge-off was $2,280.65. 9. Plaintiff is not seeking to recover any post charge-off interest and/or fees. However, in accordance with California Civil Code §1788.58(a)(4), the following is explanation of the amount that the Plaintiff is seeking to recover: Charge-off Balance2 $2,280.65 Total Post Charge-Off Interest $0.00 Total Post Charge-Off Fees3 $0.00 10. Pursuant to California Civil Code §1788.58(a)(5), Plaintiff alleges that the date of the last I payment was February 03, 2013 which was made to CITIBANK, N.A.. ll. Pursuant to California Civil Code §1788.58(a)(6), Plaintiff alleges that the name of the charge-off creditor at the time of the charge-off is CITIBANK, N.A.. On information and belief the Plaintiff alleges that an address utilized by CITIBANK, N.A. at the time of charge-off was 701 EAST 60TH STREET NORTH SIOUX FALLS SD 57117. At the time of charge off the account number OOQOMJ>WNHO©O°QQKII$UJN~O associated with the debt was XXXXXXXXXXXX-SSS l. 12. Pursuant to California Civil Code §1788.58(a)(7), Plaintiff alleges that the name of the debtor as it appeared in the records of CITIBANK, N.A. is RAYMOND C EUSANTOS and the last known address as it appeared in the records of CITIBANK, N.A. is 437 87TH ST APT 3 DALY CITY CA 94015-1709. 1 Pursuant to California Rule of Court and California Civil Code §1788.58(c) the Account number has been redacted to protect the Defendant's confidential information. 2 This amount may include the charged-off principalamount and pre-charge-off accrued interest as set forth in the seller data sheet attachedhereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A. 3 This amount is not reflective of the costs incurred in the filing and service of this action which are recoverable pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure §1033.5. -2- COMPLAINTCA__01326 File No.1 333277 .'/ “ 13. ' Pursuant to California Civil Code §1788.58(a)(8), Plaintiff alleges that the name and address of A9 all post charge-off purchasers of the debt are as follows: XVJ Name Address MIDLAND FUNDING LLC 2365 NORTHSIDE DRIVE SUITE 300 SAN DIEGO CA 92108 ‘11¢.t 14. Pursuant to California Civil Code §1788.58(a)(9) Plaintiff alleges that it has complied with the provisions of Civil Code §l788.52 and that it informed Defendant of the assignment of the \OOO\10\ account. Attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of the first written communication sent to the consumer by Plaintiff. 15. Pursuant to California Civil Code §l788.58(b) attached hereto and incorporated herein10 by reference as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of a monthly statement recording a purchasell transaction, payment or balance transfer while the account was active as required by California Civil12 Code §1788.52(b).l3 16. The Account balance at the time of charge-off was $2,280.65, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of a billing statement that was14 mailed to Defendant stating the balance due on the Account at the time of charge-off.15 17. By this complaint, Plaintiff seeks to recover amounts of $2,280.65 from Defendant.16 18. As alleged above, before filing this suit, all right, title and interest to the Account were17 sold and assigned to Plaintiff. Plaintiff owns the Account and is entitled to collect on the Account as if itl8 were the original creditor. To the extent that Plaintiff acts in its capacity as successor-in-interest to the19 original creditor or its assigns, references herein to Plaintiff may include Plaintiffs predecessor-in-20 interest.21 19. Before commencement of this action, Plaintiff informed Defendant in writing that it22 intended to file this action and that this action could result in a judgment against Defendant that would include court costs allowed by California Code of Civil Procedure § 1033(b)(2). Attached hereto and23 incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit E is a copy of Plaintiff s most recent attempt at resolving the24 underlying obligation.25 MIDLAND'S EFFORTS TO RESOLVE THE UNDERLYING OBLIGATION26 20. Plaintiff MIDLAND FUNDING LLC owns portfolios of consumer receivables, which it27 attempts to collect. Plaintiff MIDLAND FUNDING LLC and its affiliates (collectively, “MIDLAND”)28 generally attempt to contact consumers like Defendant through several means, such as phone calls, letters, or other means, all in an effort to establish contact and to resolve the underlying obligation. -3- COMPLAINTCA_013ZG File No.1 333277 é/ a In doing so, MIDLAND attempts to assess each consumer’s willingness to pay, through phone calls, letters or other means. MIDLAND attempts to exclude consumers from its collection efforts, where M] MIDLAND believes those consumers are facing extenuating circ*mstances or hardships that would XVJ prevent them from making any payments. UI-hLoJM 21. When MIDLAND contacts consumers, it strives to treat consumers with respect, compassion, and integrity. MIDLAND works with consumers in an effort to find mutually-beneficial solutions, often offering discounts, hardship plans, and payment options. MIDLAND’s efforts are aimed at working with consumers to repay their obligations and to attain financial recovery. MIDLAND strives \OOO\]O'\ to engage in dialogue that is honorable and constructive, and to play a positive role in consumers’ lives. 22. Despite MIDLAND’s efforts to reach consumers and resolve the consumer’s obligations, only a percentage of consumers choose to engage with MIDLAND. Those who do are often offered discounts or payment plans that are intended to suit their needs. MIDLAND would prefer to work with10 consumers to establish voluntary payment arrangements resulting in the resolution of any underlyingll obligations.12 23. However, the majority of MIDLAND’s consumers ignore calls or letters, and somel3 simply refuse to repay their obligations despite an apparent ability to do so. When this happens,l4 MIDLAND must decide then whether to pursue collection through legal channels, including litigation like the present action against Defendant. Although the Account is now in litigation, Plaintiff remainsl6 willing to explore a mutually-beneficial solution through voluntary payment arrangements, if possible. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTIONl7 ACCOUNT STATED — AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTSl8 24. Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing paragraphs.l9 25. Defendant opened, used, and derived benefit from the Account through Defendant’s own20 of the Account or by another’s use at Defendant’s direction. use By using the Account, Defendant21 expressly agreed or impliedly promised to repay Plaintiff.22 26. Within the last four (4) years, Defendant became indebted on the Account to Plaintiff in23 the sum of $2,280.65 on an account stated in writing by and between Plaintiff and Defendant in which it was agreed that Defendant was indebted to Plaintiff.24 27. Regular monthly statements were mailed to Defendant listing the debits, credits, and25 balance due on the Account, attached as Exhibit D.262728 .4 COMPLAINTCA_013ZG File No.1 333277 V ' 28. Defendant last made a payment on the Account on February 03, 2013 to CITIBANK, A9 '4 XV:I N.A.. [Q 29. Plaintiff has no record of Defendant objecting to the monthly statements after receipt. b-I 30. Plaintiff has made demand on Defendant for repayment of the account stated but Defendant has failed to pay the balance due. Attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as J}- Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of first written communication requesting payment that was sent to U1 the consumer by Plaintiff. O\ 31. As of the date of this complaint there is due and owing the unpaid sum of $2,280.65. \l This amount was arrived by subtracting all payments and applying all credits (if any) to the charge-off 00 balance of $2,280.65 as indicated on the charge-off statement, attached here to as Exhibit D. KO WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendant as follows: On the First Cause of Action:10 1. For the unpaid balance of $2,280.65;ll 2. Costs of suit;l2 3. Such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper.131415l61718l92.0 Dated: JUL 1 8 2016 By: 41/ / MIDLAND FUNDING LLC U MISHAELA J. GRAVES [I KRISTY GABRIELOVA [1 PATRICK T. SULLIVAN 12] DEANNA FRASER Q CHAD K. CASEY21222324'2526'27'28 -5- CONIPLAINTCA_013ZG File No.1 333277 EXHIBIT AAA__0125 File No.1 333277 §ILL OF SALE AND ASSIGNMENTTHIS BILL OF SALE AND ASSIGNMENT, dated March 26, 2014, is by Citibank, NA, anational banking association organized under the laws of the United States, located at 701 East60th Street North, Sioux Falls, SD 57117 (the "Bank") to Midland Funding LLC, organizedunder the laws of the State of Delaware, with its headquarters/principal place of business at 3111Camino Del Rio North, Suite 1300, San Diego, CA 92108 ("Buyer")For value received and subject to the terms and conditions of the Purchase and Sale Agreementdated March 21, 2014, between Buyer and the Bank (the "Agreement"), the Bank does herebytransfer, sell, assign, convey, grant, bargain, set over and deliver to Buyer, and to Buyer'ssuccessors and assigns, the Accounts described in Exhibit 1 and the final electronic file.With respect to information for the Accounts listed m Asset Schedule, to the best of the Bank sknowledge, the Bank represents and warrants to Buyer that (i) the Account informationconstitutes the Bank’s own business records and accurately reflects 1n all material respects theinformation in the Bank’s database; (ii) the Account information was kept in the regular courseof business; (iii) the Account information was made at or near the time by, or from informationtransmitted by, a person with knowledge of the data entered into and maintained in the Account’sdatabase; and (1v) it is the regular practice of the Bank’s business to maintain and compile suchdata.Citibank, N. A.By: :/“/é )/// (Signature)Name: Patricia HallTitle: Financial Account Mana er Contract ID: Document ID: 031314ENIBBlEBGl Document ID: 031314EN1BBIPBGl AFFIDAVIT OF SALE OF ACCOUNT BY ORIGINAL CREDITOR State of South Dakota County of Minnehaha Patricia Hall, being duly swom, deposes and says: l am the Financial Account Manager of Citibank, NA. (“CBNA”) located at 701 East 60th Street North, Sioux Falls, SD 571 l7, am authorized to make the statements and representations herein and I am over l8 years of age. In this position, I have access to the creditor’s books and records and am awanc of the process of the sale of accounts and electronic storage of business records. On or about March 26, 2014, CBNA sold a pool of charged-off accounts (the Accountsi by a Purchase and Sale Agreement and a Bill of Sale to Midland Funding LLC. As part of the sale of the Accounts, certain electronic records were trmtsferred on individual accounts to the debt buyer. These records were kept in the ordinary course of business of creditor. I am not aware of any errors in the information provided about the Accounts. The above statements are true to the best of my knowledge. t 31$’ Signed this day of Indy-cl! , 20/4’ Patricia Hall 5’ / 5y . Sworn before me this day of Whit/W? , 801 ‘\L *5 rm file/4w elm/w Notary Public 5:, \ 1 AR ‘ novw' 075,-‘? . jalpggmhrgétorgegpims; oeltaflfl ..--“§t“vf ii? $3.?)gf-J»AA_0125 File No.1 333277 I ' ' Contract ID . Document ID 031314ENlBBlEBGl Document ID: 0313I4ENIBBIPBGI CERTIFICATE OF CONFORMITY STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA CITY OF SIOUX FALLS The undersigned does hereby certify that he/she is an attorney at law duly admitted to practice in the State of South Dakota and is a resident of Sioux Falls, in the State of South Dakota; that he/she is a person duly qualified to make this certificate of conformity pursuant to the laws of the State of South Dakota; that the foregoing acknowledgment by Patricia Hall named in the foregoing instrument taken before Louise M. Sandoval, a Notary in the State of South Dakota, was taken in the manner prescribed by such laws of the State of South Dakota, being the State in QJQ which it was taken; and that it duly conforms with such laws and is in all respects valid and effective in such state. Da e ?N. nc Rasmussen Attorney at Law'm the State of South DakotaAA_0125 File No.1 333277 Field Field Data ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NUMBER CROSS-REFERENCE NUMBER ACCOUNT OPEN DATE 12-May-11 CHARGE OFF AMOUNT 52,280.65 CHARGE OFF DATE 15-Sep-13 DEBTOR NAME FIRST RAYMOND C DEBTOR NAME LAST EUSANTOS DEBTOR RESIDENCE ADDRESS 1 437 87TH ST APT 3 DEBTOR RESIDENCE CITY DALY CITY DEBTOR RESIDENCE PHONE 6507581957 DEBTOR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER ‘"“6895 DEBTOR STATE CA DEBTOR ZIP CODE 940151709 LAST PAYMENT AMOUNT $60.00 LAST PAYMENT DATE 03-Feb-13 LAST PURCHASE DATE 24-Jun-12 RMS OFFICER CODE DESCRIPTION BEST BUY PRIVATE LABEL SALE AMOUNT $2,280.65 Data printed by Midland Credit Management, lnc. from electronic records provided by Citibank, N.A. pursuant to the Bill of Sale / Assignment of Accounts transferred on or about 3/26/2014 in connection with the sale of accounts from Citibank, N.A. to Midland Funding, LLC.AA_0125 File No.2 333277 EXHIBIT BAA_0126 File No.1 333277 —Midlu- cml WI‘. Human‘. Int __ Mldllmd o Flange “ml m mcmzszziwm - ~ ~ _mcm aarswunm smzoo mama cs 6:123 M . 3563099 1a1 San Blogo. osIoszou MIDLAND ruunlus Lu: "505-2014 NA. Rly'fl'ofldc Eumos RaymunaCEusonlm IE > - q,» 7 "-- 800 Hllulfi lawn A»! 5 860H31$B0 BlvdAm5 may Ely‘ CA 94014-2303 $2.2 805$ ~ ugly Cily. CA anon-ma I'lllIa-I1IlI-Il'-"-Il"l'"I""lII1I'llllI-ll'dllII'lIu 06-1940“ slAlTEMEN'r can zessazs P'mm; Balsam: (EDD) MCMMeoumn 5563099161 ommlmm msss' I ‘NOTICE OFFNEW blERsHllih'Nn ERE-LEGAL R'EVIEW Sklmn! Dam: Gin-oifmmor. wznu Duo Dam: 06402014 Ongnal Clad non MN“ Wm" CwTin: Salmon: ow Raynnw. t - . 1 ‘.4 .VLDWDLUNDINGJ-l-B. Q'IWJXJ! A- 9&0“ aw aw mm wa told m MIDLAND FUNDING Euu mu ‘diam Fla-awed‘y 71-m- BENEFITS OFPAYIPIG 0n 0&26'2014.yalcnmnl. NA/ . SI“ 00M. “431M 0M1 MIMI‘, lm. ‘WU llc, whnh I. "GI DB WONT-Bf umbicolaannmiwvymfibewhqmandmwwmmnmnhela‘!!! ' FM)" IZ'YWI'“ 08-11110“ 05052014 Thonaovomumoodmeoulr mm FUNDINGlLC. fiaéammmu- i I Dumtcd by MIDLAND FUNDING LLC and Is sun/woo by Mnland Clad‘ bem- lIla “cum gun‘ u Hfi-NIGCMJIW ht ISMI'IWIWCM "BEWHDUIIBF-Umylfl “unnamed. Inc. (M0811 The name d WI “QIWWHUQMML'WI, orpmmdthatmooorndmmadm'mhudmnum! UMWPIdm" “Mm WMWPIIMIB'IUCW - $228065“ dw MK Wampum ml lo draws‘ your opus":- Elma. dImtlosOlmdolvw tu: I M'Uland Cmdl: Man "LIDC. a“ mm Mumyou a mm'vv pmmmbywwmu. m mlypfmwlh 'BBISMD DINO-“182w Wmlhin oecounl In m my San D $0,091,123 ‘(iiiim'afmmfk Whlldn ynu Md l0 do In IIBPIIIII 9'06!" 1mm :u'lllrlulflg'? names 1) |I§Illlw°mw 2) ca'lln l0 :“mwmqmrmemu Mylm plans‘ and Plano unmml ml‘ I6 a communication mm u am collodol. This I! Ill mum»: to colloa n LEI‘ us HELP volll lllhu nowun! goaloan a'lcmuy. when» cpl-cm 'r-w m mm Any Enhlmlflflll clmd will m uaod luv-n purpotn. ii Imw Duvwbb Dywv'nwm I8 On Why Inmnhnmnoomnmk wl u:.WI uncouuw you m all us: moms-Bus. Fol new“ irpomml m1 n'amulon, wmmmmmn'mdlmwn ly 511mm‘ (Mommas Dcpuvncnl “Md Cram mmm, m . CALL 05! (800) 2658825 .. ‘I'mwunlmuynlll be mannodmyou'omfl' lupofl u mam Wowllml'camywwcbllnnwmnhutawl‘muupnpuyrwllnhlx mm myrmlwwoszw and mu niplyl'mnhmwnw. Wyoumy AMI-m ‘Mll'myw rnmniPlIdlnhll Ifywpiybsmmymnhllm'amc.wcwii upon yours momma» Pnld In lull rerun nun IN mllugmw.“ PLEASE SEE FEVERSE SIDE FOR IMPOR'AN'I DISCLOSURE INFORMATION W'.‘ 1 ‘ow-m m a Cllli (amyzesms ; 9n 0mm w MMWWIM Hulk PIN‘ Co llflIfi Orgylulll'lccqurl! N .,Cunv'r'l1501incnz' », - 4 4' , ' ' )LWW'W Eimlm-muab-néflmmv w WI?‘ , ‘1.1..{kl-$261 .l._.l.. 4w IMMMMPQM uummtwgmfi. "1_ ' ' ,1" wa'im'd ciua wu'wnm. Incl q, £057 K L'HUAA_0126 File N0.: 333277 Immm Dlxlv'un With": Pill“ unm'rd IN! II l mmwiuflon horn I dameoilndw. TN! It In Ifllmpi la cull.“ I MN Any ln'ommbn nimlmdwfll a. mod 10v um manna. Callnomdlormxn um mpmmy m moulwnd ornwdud. ‘mo mom ammo wlh on Olmnk. NA. amount wmma by wouwn FUNDING uc. “ma m yw mu ohigamd m (MORGWIE, m mm. mu u n mama. For 'uKh-f momma mm m ml m u” mm mm n Allhomlollhhmwfl.MWWWMUIWNMMWJUDLANO FUNJWLLCBQWLQMMM mmmkluuwnmmlm mmdnqlnumnvmldbnwanswmnwmmummmn Umlym wwummnwwmmmmvmm wimmalywdbpulnmnvdlhodlbkornvy www.mqlmmsa-mumma. HWUIWYMOI,MIHJQ,‘1MM(ISMMWMIMMNM"64137.8WMMMMJIflW. mnemmurmnndmamcrewmanmawnnmmmg-mpwncuvilmmamwum wmmunulmgm nyuu mmlnq wmmlaonmrmrwwqm MmJACM wlmywm mwmmmmu nllhom*omiovdm Uan utwmywusum mmmwmlo mnm. pnmmfur mmloycvranmnyimm. "1w omlnvohzqm (madamMummordmdmdmbwnfiwnmodhnbmbummpmMnl'lobmrlayouv bmkmulcymnnwysommmmmnd. Puumber. marmnapayrwflmWflymNuyntormmWsnolh. wuummmww ammmmyuwnuummnghnWM Youlnhembynmindmlnapalm/uaonmfecmgonywruodlnm'flnuybowbmlhdlcauoclww wlywldlafulllmlonrlolyuuuumobwfl Ouwmulicdbln Wing panes-um. mud-m; m Imuummm-aom n Ml mum oi am. an a no MUM”: BUSMDM swam HMLPAVHENTBYD: P.O BnfloinJq. “Wkmm Sh M.CA02123 SanDew CAOZYBJM Mmuwpcnsflv "Ml. NRREfiPONDENCE BUT NO FAYIENTS TU: 8675M!!! 5030 200 "ML CREDIT IU: ICM CREDfl' M0 50M 0875 DUI!» 200. 5m vow CA. azm w- no loqulmd mu um In: (a may cemmon a! 1m tolloulng 1mm ‘ma nu ma m com-In n MBIMI 6M"! "ll 0| ll'ln film hlv. HM" Illll and MU‘! IF YOU IJVE IN CALFDRNW. THSAPPUEB TO YOU‘ Mmmidmflm'wwflFMDCNCOMMPmflGMWV-hflfllwfl ThndJJRMUWFflI mmnmdmmm.mm:wymlmuywwomflnm mafiaswn 1117mm! numymbyunnu mmolvumolamu bymhg mobngum cum my mmmmwwng awmnm orulyw mm WNW q'rmcwmwwnnoomu 'Nmpmaocnmmqmvvnunnymmhmhmmaa.’ aw 0M:IMWMFunmmnmmnmdmlmmmgyulnuywudm “mum byhmynu mmymhfidlhuanewwouudilwnnmlbchflmyw'mlmdMbosmn'dbn coda-upon"; mmvmuwwnuemayouruwlwwau ADDI'HONALACMUNTINFORHAHM @1l" Emma: ' $2.280 65 Pflndpal Bihnaut S 7250,65 CMM-Oflbfle; TomlPoam'mpoOnlnmros: $ 0.00 Mama! Rm‘: LAN Payrmm Dmni m.~\sm\a @012913 TOW MOM Balm“: MCM lnbmfl Foes $ S 0 no um mownumbdmoouuo. W‘! QMBaLvu: ‘hows! Rmmodhowulmulml MOM Fons: $ 2.28055 Inw- Nun-and mmmm “mun-yum lntinclumoflcmlmn Roam-d: PllollamnSd-a! 2212:: :wnl: mvuonu c cosmos omen uuxnm mum 441 arm arms‘ murcm. m_ 04015 trumpet! can-m mum NumbnAuocllm unr- on Roma Fw mncwwon Ima Ind/0' Fm. l1 my: N/A ,“m ' mm-mmam acmwcmnwumuauqvom cmamc NA41BI smmsmumwummnmn Win» Chain MTIUO hdudlnl All Ml Chlmofl mm “TIM DOM: UHBANK MA HUI-AND FUNDING [L0, WSAMO DY. 54h 2W. $111 W. “97123AA_0126 File No.1 333277 EXHIBIT CAA_0127 File No.2 333277 ‘we’ W HSBC (D Best B Account Statement Account Numberm-SSH Page 1 012 From January 14. 201 o e ruary ,2013' euiiirnarmlnééauiitjrt'cuimy l‘ _. . _ ; ,lag; fiymint'lfiirfi’€ti _ ; _ Prewous Balance $1,457.82 New Balance Payments - $60.00 Minimum Payment Due $29.00 Other Credfls - ‘ $0.00 Payment Due Date March 7. 2013 Purchases/Debits + $0.00 t .00 :gztsizzuheaAgnlcgun + $22.53 Late Payment Warning: if we do not receive your minimum payment by the Interest Charged + $1416

Related Contentin San Mateo County

Case

BARBARA NGUYEN, et al vs. YISROEL HERZKA, et al

Jul 31, 2024 |Swope, V. Raymond |(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD |24-CIV-04750

Case

24-CIV-04700

Jul 30, 2024 |24-CIV-04700

Case

24-CIV-04650

Jul 26, 2024 |24-CIV-04650

Case

24-CIV-04674

Jul 29, 2024 |24-CIV-04674

Case

16089907

Jul 29, 2024 |16089907

Case

24-CIV-04707

Jul 30, 2024 |24-CIV-04707

Case

24-CIV-04749

Jul 31, 2024 |24-CIV-04749

Case

24-CIV-04805

Aug 01, 2024 |24-CIV-04805

Case

24-CIV-04706

Jul 30, 2024 |24-CIV-04706

Ruling

ALLY BANK, A CORPORATION vs BARRIENTOS

Aug 03, 2024 |CVSW2404598

ALLY BANK, A APPLICATION FOR WRIT OFCVSW2404598 CORPORATION VS POSSESSION - CLAIM AND DELIVERYBARRIENTOS BY ALLY BANK, A CORPORATIONTentative Ruling: The Court does not have any Proof of Service that that the Defendanthas been served/noticed with this Application for Writ of Possession. The court will hearfrom the parties at time of the hearing.4.NEAL VS RIVERSIDE MOTION FOR RETURN OF SEIZEDCVSW2406566COUNTY SHERIFF PROPERTYTentative Ruling: Motion unopposed. Motion GRANTED.A criminal defendant, “may bring a non-statutory motion for return of propertyseized by warrant or incident to arrest which was not introduced into evidence butremained in possession of the seizing officer.” (People v. Lemonte (1997) 53Cal.App.4th 544, 549 [emphasis added].)Here, Plaintiff argues that good cause exists for the return of the seized propertybecause over one year has passed since the incident, and the Office of the DistrictAttorney has failed to prosecute the matter. In support, Plaintiff submitted his owndeclaration, stating that there are no charges currently pending against him for which anyof these items would be used as evidence, they are not property the possession of whichis prohibited by law, and they do not need to be retained for any investigative or otherlawful purposes. (Neal Decl.) Based on this evidence, Plaintiff has shown that he isentitled to return of property seized during his traffic stop.Court will sign the Proposed Order.

Ruling

LVNV FUNDING LLC vs PEREZ

Jul 30, 2024 |Frank Anthony Moschetti |CVCO2306013

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THECVCO2306013 LVNV FUNDING VS PEREZ PLEADINGS ON COMPLAINT FORCOLLECTIONS OF LVNV FUNDINGTentative Ruling: No tentative at this time.

Ruling

LVNV FUNDING, LLC vs. KARLY BOOTH

Jul 31, 2024 |24CV13536

No appearances necessary. This is a collections case, as defined in Rule 3.740 of the California Rules of Court, filed January 31, 2024. A proof of service is filed. Plaintiff must obtain default judgment within 360 days of filing the complaint. (Cal. Rules of Court, Rule 3.740(f).) This matter is continued for further CMC to December 11, 2024 at 1:30 p.m. in Dept 3.

Ruling

Bank of America N.A. vs Javier Naranjo

Jul 31, 2024 |23CV-04483

23CV-04483 Bank of America NA v. Javier NaranjoMotion for Order that Requests for Admission be deemed admittedAppearance required. Parties who wish to appear remotely must contact the clerk of thecourt at (209) 725-4111 to seek permission and arrange for a remote appearance.Case Management ConferenceAppearance required. Parties who wish to appear remotely must contact the clerk of thecourt at (209) 725-4111 to seek permission and arrange for a remote appearance.

Ruling

Captial One, N.A. vs. Ward

Aug 02, 2024 |23CVG-01215

CAPITAL ONE, N.A. VS. WARDCase Number: 23CVG-01215Tentative Ruling on Motion for Order that Matters in Request for Admission of Truth of Facts beAdmitted: Plaintiff Capital One, N.A. seeks an order deeming the truth of matters specified in Plaintiff’s Requestfor Admissions, Set One. Despite being timely served, Defendant Leah Ward did not file an Opposition.When a party fails to respond to a request for admission, the requesting party may move for an order deeming thegenuineness of documents and the truth of matters specified in the requests admitted. CCP § 2033.280(b). Failureto respond also waives any objections to the discovery propounded. CCP § 2033.280(a). Plaintiff’s moving paperssufficiently demonstrate that Defendant has failed to respond to the Request for Admissions within the requiredtime frame.Unlike a motion to compel further responses, a motion to compel responses when no responses have beenprovided does not require the propounding party to demonstrate good cause or that it satisfied a meet-and-conferrequirement. Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants (2007) 148 Cal. App. 4th390. Despite there being no requirement to meet and confer, Plaintiff sent a meet and confer letter to Defendant,through her former counsel, prior to filing the motion.Monetary sanctions are mandatory per CCP 2033.280(c), however, Plaintiff did not seek monetary sanctions andprovided no evidence regarding attorney’s fees or other costs associated with bringing the motion. Sanctionsshould only be imposed for “reasonable” expenses. CCP § 2023.030. The Court does not have information uponwhich to make a finding that any amount of sanctions were for reasonable expenses and should not imposesanctions.The motion is GRANTED. Defendant is deemed to have admitted as true each of the items contained inPlaintiff’s Request for Admissions, Set One. Objections are waived. Plaintiff provided a proposed Order thatwill be executed by the Court. The Court confirms the trial date of January 21, 2025.

Ruling

NATIONAL COMMERCIAL RECOVERY INC vs MARTINEZ, HERIBERTO a)

Jul 30, 2024 |CV-23-007462

CV-23-007462 – NATIONAL COMMERCIAL RECOVERY INC vs MARTINEZ, HERIBERTO – a) Plaintiff’s Motion for an Order that the Truth of Matters Specified in Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions be Deemed Admitted as Against Defendant Heriberto Martinez; Request for Sanctions of $610.00 - GRANTED, and unopposed; b) Plaintiff’s Motion for an Order that the Truth of Matters Specified in Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions be Deemed Admitted as Against Defendant Maria Elena Martinez; Request for Sanctions of $610.00 - GRANTED, and unopposed.(a)-(b) - Plaintiff’s unopposed motions are GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions, Set One, propounded on Defendant Heriberto Martinez, are deemed admitted. Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions, Set One, propounded on Defendant Maria Elena Martinez, are also deemed admitted. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 2033.280(b)-(c).)Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 2033.280(c), the Court awards sanctions in the amount of $610 in fees and costs against each Defendant, for a total award of $1,220. Defendant Heriberto Martinez and Defendant Maria Elena Martinez are ordered to pay the sanctions to Plaintiff’s attorney of record, Glenn A. Besnyl.The Court will make some minor revisions to the proposed orders that were submitted along with the motions and then will sign them.

Ruling

AMCOR LIGHTING INC. DBA JIAO GUANG USA GROUP VS PARMIDA, L.L.C., ET AL.

Aug 01, 2024 |22CMCV00144

Case Number: 22CMCV00144 Hearing Date: August 1, 2024 Dept: A 23CMCV00250 Veronica Alejandra Segura v. Walmart, Inc. Thursday, August 1, 2024, at 8:30 a.m. [TENTATIVE] ORDER GRANTING Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint I. BACKGROUND This is a premises liability action arising from injuries Plaintiff allegedly sustained after falling at Defendants store. Plaintiff requests an order to amend the complaint to add a prayer for punitive damages and a cause of action for negligent hiring, retention, and supervision. Plaintiff asserts that the punitive damages claim is based on information recently discovered showing that Defendant ignored the fact that the area around the fountain where Plaintiff fell was an ongoing and dangerous condition that persisted for a substantial period. Defendant will not suffer any prejudice as a consequence of the amendments. In opposition, Defendant argues that the motion is vague, and Plaintiff delayed in amending the complaint as Defendant served its discovery responses on May 30, 2023. Significant discovery has already occurred, and Defendant will be required to conduct further discovery related to the newly related claims, which Walmart is attempting to investigate by targeting discovery on these new claims. Responses are due on July 30, 2024. Plaintiff did not file a reply brief by July 25, 2024 (five court days before the hearing.) (Code Civ. Proc., 1005(b). II. LEGAL STANDARDS Leave to amend is permitted at the courts discretion upon any terms that may be just. (Code Civ. Proc., § 473 subd. (a)(1).) The statute is liberally construed to permit amendment of the pleadings unless an attempt is made to present an entirely different set of facts by way of the amendment. (Atkinson v. Elk Corp. (2003) 109 Cal.App.4th 739, 760.) If the motion is timely made, and the granting of the motion will not result in prejudice to the opposing party, it is error to refuse permission to amend. (Morgan v. Superior Court of Cal. In and For Los Angeles County (1959) 172 Cal.App.2d 527, 530.) Where denial of the motion will result in a party being deprived of the right to assert a meritorious cause of action, it is not only error but an abuse of discretion. (Id.) Amendments are permitted up to the date of trial or during trial where no prejudice is shown to the adverse party. (Atkinson v. Elk Corp. (2003) 109 Cal.App.4th 739, 761.) III. DISCUSSION Defendant has not shown any prejudice resulting from the proposed amendments. Current counsel was not associated in this case as trial counsel until June 7, 2024, at which time Mr. Soofer examined the facts and moved to amend the pleading. (Mot., Ramin Soofer decl., ¶ 4-5.) Even if Plaintiff obtained the relevant facts supporting amendments in May of 2023, trial is not set until October 24, 2024, and Defendant is mitigating any prejudice by conducting targeted discovery on the new issues. (Opp., Lisa Mallinson decl., ¶¶ 5-7.) The claim for negligent hiring is based on the same facts and the same incident that forms the basis for the complaint. Defendant contends there is no evidence to support the claim for punitive damages. (Opp., Mallinson decl., ¶3.) However, a court may not condition leave to amend on production of admissible evidence substantiating the allegations of the amended pleading. (Sanai v. Saltz (2009) 170 Cal.App.4th 746, 770 ["Although we may entertain some skepticism as to the nature of the competent and credible proof Brehm will be able to offer in support of these allegations, the issue before us is not whether his evidence will be sufficient but whether his allegations of intentional misconduct and bad faith are.]" Moreover, evidentiary facts are not required to be alleged. (Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. (1998) 19 Cal. 4th 26, 47; Lim v. The.TV Corp. Internat. (2002) 99 Cal. App. 4th 684, 690.) IV. CONCLUSION Accordingly, Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiff is directed to file and serve the amended pleading forthwith.

Ruling

Value Recovery Group. L.P. vs. Sidebar Legal, PC, et al.

Jul 31, 2024 |23CV-0201860

ET AL.Case Number: 23CV-0201860Tentative Ruling on Order to Show Cause Re Dismissal: An Order to Show Cause Re:Dismissal (“OSC”) issued on June 24, 2024, pursuant to Gov’t Code § 68608(b) to Plaintiff andPlaintiff’s Counsel for failure to appear at the June 17, 2024, hearing as ordered on February 20,2024. No response to the OSC has been filed. The Court previously sanctioned Plaintiff andCounsel for failure to timely serve the parties. The parties have not been served. The sanctionshave not been paid. It appears Plaintiff has abandoned this action and lesser sanctions would notbe effective. The Court DISMISSES this action. The clerk is instructed to prepare a separateOrder of Dismissal. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.****************************************************************************** 9:00 a.m. Review Hearings******************************************************************************

Document

COMMERCIAL COLLECTIONS OF AMERICA, LLC vs. ELIZABETH BAILEY, et al

May 11, 2023 |Greenberg, Susan |(09) Unlimited Other Collections |23-CIV-02201

Document

COMMERCIAL COLLECTIONS OF AMERICA, LLC vs. ELIZABETH BAILEY, et al

May 11, 2023 |Greenberg, Susan |(09) Unlimited Other Collections |23-CIV-02201

Document

Bi-Rite Restaurant Supply Co., Inc. vs. Nicholas Colombo, et al

Apr 09, 2024 |Greenberg, Susan |(09) Unlimited Other Collections |24-CIV-02121

Document

Bi-Rite Restaurant Supply Co., Inc. vs. Nicholas Colombo, et al

Apr 09, 2024 |Greenberg, Susan |(09) Unlimited Other Collections |24-CIV-02121

Document

Citibank, N.A. vs. Carolyn White

Dec 06, 2022 |Greenberg, Susan |(09) Unlimited Other Collections |22-CIV-05117

Document

Citibank, N.A. vs. Carolyn White

Dec 06, 2022 |Greenberg, Susan |(09) Unlimited Other Collections |22-CIV-05117

Document

Citibank, N.A. vs. Carolyn White

Dec 06, 2022 |Greenberg, Susan |(09) Unlimited Other Collections |22-CIV-05117

Document

Citibank, N.A. vs. Carolyn White

Dec 06, 2022 |Greenberg, Susan |(09) Unlimited Other Collections |22-CIV-05117

Complaint July 27, 2016 (2024)
Top Articles
Miguel Cossio on LinkedIn: New York Man Arrested for Operating as an Illegal Agent of the Chinese…
Craigslist Free Kitsap
12 Rue Gotlib 21St Arrondissem*nt
Craigslist Bellmore
Jody Plauche Wiki
Meet Scores Online 2022
Nycers Pay Schedule
Antonym For Proton
Tyson Employee Paperless
Mileage To Walmart
Craig Woolard Net Worth
Craigslist Free Stuff Columbus Ga
Dvax Message Board
Jobs Hiring Start Tomorrow
Sutter Health Candidate Login
Lynchburg Arrest.org
Maya Mixon Portnoy
Red Lobster cleared to exit bankruptcy under new owner Fortress
Jinx Bl Chapter 26
Diabetes Care - Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey
Devotion Showtimes Near Regency Towngate 8
Rugged Gentleman Barber Shop Martinsburg Wv
Monkey Werx Sitrep 2022
Cognitive Function Test Potomac Falls
When Is Moonset Tonight
Clean My Mac Sign In
Elizabeth Nj Garbage Schedule 2022
Parishes Online Bulletins
Reely Hooked Fish Dip Amazon
Erfahrungen mit Rheumaklinik Bad Aibling, Reha-Klinik, Bayern
Prot Pally Wrath Pre Patch
Wie funktioniert der Ochama Supermarkt? | Ladenbau.de Ratgeber
MyChart | University Hospitals
Chatgirlsonline
Americas Cardroom Promo Code For Existing Users
Matrizen | Maths2Mind
Corinne Massiah Bikini
Culver's Flavor Of The Day Whitewater
The Top 6 Most Expensive Hermès Birkin Bags
Fired Dies Cancer Fired Qvc Hosts
NO CLUE: deutsche Übersetzung von NCT 127
How Much Is Felipe Valls Worth
A Ghost Story movie review & film summary (2017) | Roger Ebert
Xfiles Wiki
Botw Royal Guard
Barbie: A Touch of Magic
Couponsky.com
Olive Onyx Amora
Hourly Pay At Dick's Sporting Goods
Unblocked Games 67 Ez
Corn And Tater Fest 2023
Pike County Buy Sale And Trade
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Jamar Nader

Last Updated:

Views: 5855

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (75 voted)

Reviews: 90% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Jamar Nader

Birthday: 1995-02-28

Address: Apt. 536 6162 Reichel Greens, Port Zackaryside, CT 22682-9804

Phone: +9958384818317

Job: IT Representative

Hobby: Scrapbooking, Hiking, Hunting, Kite flying, Blacksmithing, Video gaming, Foraging

Introduction: My name is Jamar Nader, I am a fine, shiny, colorful, bright, nice, perfect, curious person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.